Paper detail

A MODEL FOR THE RADIO EMISSION FROM SNR 1987A

The observations of radio emission from SNR~1987A can be accounted for on the basis of diffusive shock acceleration of electrons by the supernova blast wave. However, with this interpretation the observed spectral index implies that the compression ratio of the gas subshock is roughly $2.7$ rather than the value of $4$ expected of a strong shock front. We propose that in SNR~1987A, ions also undergo diffusive acceleration at the shock, a process that is likely to be rapid. Unlike the electron population, the accelerated ions can have an important effect on the gas dynamics. We calculate this coupled gas and energetic particle dynamics on the basis of the two-fluid model, in which the accelerated ions provide an additional component to the total pressure acting on the fluid. By accelerating and possibly heating the upstream plasma, the initially strong shock is modified and a weaker subshock with an upstream precursor results. The electrons behave as test particles. They are accelerated at the evolving subshock, escape downstream, and emit synchrotron radiation in the swept up magnetic field. Two models are considered for the surroundings of the progenitor: that of a freely expanding wind of number density $n\propto r^{-2}$, and that of a wind confined by a shell of denser material, creating a stagnation zone of roughly constant density beyond the standing shock which terminates the free wind. We model the observed radio light curves and the relatively steep spectrum of SNR~1987A using similar values for the ion acceleration parameters to those used in models of cosmic ray acceleration in older SNRs which can also contain high Mach number shocks, and find a good fit for the case in which the termination shock is located at about $2\times 10^{15}\,$m from the progenitor.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.