Paper detail

A model for the competition between political mono-polarization and bi-polarization

We investigate the phenomena of political bi-polarization in a population of interacting agents by means of a generalized version of the model introduced in PRE E 101, 012101 (2020) for the dynamics of voting intention. Each agent has a propensity $p$ in $[0,1]$ to vote for one of two political candidates. In an iteration step, two agents $i$ and $j$ with respective propensities $p_i$ and $p_j$ interact, and then $p_i$ either increases by an amount $h>0$ with a probability that is a nonlinear function of $p_i$ and $p_j$ or decreases by $h$ with the complementary probability. We study the behavior of the system under variations of a parameter $q \ge 0$ that measures the nonlinearity of the propensity update rule. We focus on the stability properties of the two distinct stationary states: mono-polarization in which all agents share the same extreme propensity ($0$ or $1$), and bi-polarization where the population is divided into two groups with opposite and extreme propensities. We find that the bi-polarized state is stable for $q<q_c$, while the mono-polarized state is stable for $q>q_c$, where $q_c$ is a transition value that decreases as $h$ decreases. We develop a rate equation approach whose stability analysis reveals that $q_c$ vanishes when $h$ becomes infinitesimally small. This result is supported by the analysis of a transport equation derived in the continuum $h \to 0$ limit. We also show by Monte Carlo simulations that the mean time $τ$ to reach mono-polarization in a system of size $N$ scales as $τ\sim N^α$ at $q_c$ , where $α(h)$ is a non-universal exponent.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.