Paper detail

A Model for Soft Interactions motivated by AdS/CFT and QCD

Monte Carlo generators which were tuned for energies up to that of the Tevatron, are found wanting when extended to LHC energies. We construct a model that satisfies the theoretical requisites of high energy soft interactions, based on two conjectures: (i) the results of the Ads/CDF correspondence for N = 4 SYM, and (ii) the requirement of matching with high energy QCD. In keeping with these postulates, we assume that the soft Pomeron intercept is relatively large, and the slope of the Pomeron trajectory is equal to zero. We derive analytical formulae that sum both the enhanced and semi-enhanced diagrams for elastic and diffractive amplitudes. Parameters of the model are obtained by fitting to experimental data, up to and including the Tevatron energies, and we predict cross sections at all energies accessible at the LHC and beyond. Predictions of the model are in agreement with measured values obtained by CMS, ATLAS and ALICE for inelastic and inclusive cross sections. We compare our results with experimental data and competing models.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.