Paper detail

A model-based assessment of the cost-benefit balance and the plea bargain in criminality -- A qualitative case study of the Covid-19 epidemic shedding light on the "car wash operation" in Brazil

We developed a simple mathematical model to describe criminality and the justice system composed of the police investigation and court trial. The model assessed two features of organized crime -- the cost-benefit analysis done by the crime-susceptible to commit a crime and the whistleblowing of the law offenders. The model was formulated considering the mass action law commonly used in the disease propagation modelings, which can shed light on the model's analysis. The crime-susceptible individuals analyze two opposing forces -- committing crime influenced by the law offenders not caught by police neither imprisonment by the court trial (benefit of enjoying the corruption incoming), and the refraction to commit crime influenced by those caught by police or condemned by a court (cost of incarceration). Moreover, we assessed the dilemma for those captured by police investigation to participate in the rewarding whistleblowing program. The model was applied to analyze the "car wash operation" against corruption in Brazil. The model analysis showed that the cost-benefit analysis of crime-susceptible individuals whether the act of bribery is worth or not determined the basic crime reproduction number (threshold); however, the rewarding whistleblowing policies improved the combat to corruption arising a sub-threshold. Some adopted mechanisms to control the Covid-19 pandemic shed light on understanding the "car wash peration" and threatens to the fight against corruption. Appropriate coverage of corruption by media, enhancement of laws against white-collar crimes, well-functioning police investigation and court trial, and the rewarding whistleblowing policies inhibited and decreased the corruption.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.