Paper detail

A minimum principle for potentials with application to Chebyshev constants

For "Riesz-like" kernels $K(x,y)=f(|x-y|)$ on $A\times A$, where $A$ is a compact $d$-regular set $A\subset \mathbb{R}^p$, we prove a minimum principle for potentials $U_K^μ=\int K(x,y)dμ(x)$, where $μ$ is a Borel measure supported on $A$. Setting $P_K(μ)=\inf_{y\in A}U^μ(y)$, the $K$-polarization of $μ$, the principle is used to show that if $\{ν_N\}$ is a sequence of measures on $A$ that converges in the weak-star sense to the measure $ν$, then $P_K(ν_N)\to P_K(ν)$ as $N\to \infty$. The continuous Chebyshev (polarization) problem concerns maximizing $P_K(μ)$ over all probability measures $μ$ supported on $A$, while the $N$-point discrete Chebyshev problem maximizes $P_K(μ)$ only over normalized counting measures for $N$-point multisets on $A$. We prove for such kernels and sets $A$, that if $\{ν_N\}$ is a sequence of $N$-point measures solving the discrete problem, then every weak-star limit measure of $ν_N$ as $N \to \infty$ is a solution to the continuous problem.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.