Paper detail

A micropolar peridynamics model with non-unified horizon for damage of solids with different non-local effects

Most peridynamics models adopt regular point distribution and unified horizon, limiting their flexibility and engineering applications. In this work, a micropolar peridynamics approach with non-unified horizon (NHPD) is proposed. This approach is implemented in a conventional finite element framework, using element-based discretization. By modifying the dual horizon approach into the pre-processing part, point dependent horizon and non-unified beam-like bonds are built. By implementing a domain correction strategy, the equivalence of strain energy density is assured. Then, a novel energy density-based failure criterion is presented which directly bridges the critical stretch to the mechanical strength. The numerical results indicate the weak mesh dependency of NHPD and the effectiveness of the new failure criterion. Moreover, it is proven that damage of solid with different non-local effects can lead to similar results by only adjusting the mechanical strength.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.