Paper detail

A Methodology to Support Automatic Cyber Risk Assessment Review

Cyber risk assessment is a fundamental activity for enhancing the protection of an organization, identifying and evaluating the exposure to cyber threats. Currently, this activity is carried out mainly manually and the identification and correct quantification of risks deeply depend on the experience and confidence of the human assessor. As a consequence, the process is not completely objective and two parallel assessments of the same situation may lead to different results. This paper takes a step in the direction of reducing the degree of subjectivity by proposing a methodology to support risk assessors with an automatic review of the produced assessment. Our methodology starts from a controls-based assessment performed using well-known cybersecurity frameworks (e.g., ISO 27001, NIST) and maps security controls over infrastructural aspects that can be assessed automatically (e.g., ICT devices, organization policies). Exploiting this mapping, the methodology suggests how to identify controls needing revision. The approach has been validated through a case study from the healthcare domain and a set of statistical analyses.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.