Paper detail

A methodology to identify the level of reuse using template factors

To build large scale software systems, Component Based Software Engineering (CBSE) has played a vital role. The current practices of software industry demands more development of a software within time and budget which is highly productive to them. It became so necessary to achieve how effectively the software component is reusable. In order to meet this, the component level reuse, in terms of both class and method level can be possibly done. The traditional approaches are presented in the literature upto the level of extent of achievement of reuse. Any how still effective reuse is a challenging issue as a part. In this paper, a methodology has proposed for the identification of reuse level which has been considered by the using reuse metrics such as the Class Template Factor(CTF) and Method Template Factor(MTF). By considering these measures makes easy to identify the level of reuse so that helps in the growth the productivity in the organization.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.