Paper detail

A Methodology for Studying VANET Performance with Practical Vehicle Distribution in Urban Environment

In a Vehicular Ad-hoc Network (VANET), the amount of interference from neighboring nodes to a communication link is governed by the vehicle density dynamics in vicinity and transmission probabilities of terminals. It is obvious that vehicles are distributed non-homogeneously along a road segment due to traffic controls and speed limits at different portions of the road. The common assumption of homogeneous node distribution in the network in most of the previous work in mobile ad-hoc networks thus appears to be inappropriate in VANETs. In light of the inadequacy, we present in this paper an original methodology to study the performance of VANETs with practical vehicle distribution in urban environment. Specifically, we introduce the stochastic traffic model to characterize the general vehicular traffic flow as well as the randomness of individual vehicles, from which we can acquire the mean dynamics and the probability distribution of vehicular density. As illustrative examples, we demonstrate how the density knowledge from the stochastic traffic model can be utilized to derive the throughput and progress performance of three routing strategies in different channel access protocols. We confirm the accuracy of the analytical results through extensive simulations. Our results demonstrate the applicability of the proposed methodology on modeling protocol performance, and shed insight into the performance analysis of other transmission protocols and network configurations in vehicular networks. Furthermore, we illustrate that the optimal transmission probability for optimized network performance can be obtained as a function of the location space from our results. Such information can be computed by road-side nodes and then broadcasted to road users for optimized multi-hop packet transmission in the communication network.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.