Paper detail

A method to statistically characterize turbulent data with physically motivated parameters, illustrated on a centroid velocity map

We investigate the potential of a recently proposed model for 3D compressible MHD turbulence (Chevillard et al. 2010; Durrive et al. 2021) to be used as a tool to characterize statistically 2D and 3D turbulent data. This model is parametrized by a dozen of free (intuitive, physically motivated) parameters, which control the statistics of the fields (density, velocity and magnetic fields). The present study is a proof of concept study: (i) we restrict ourselves to the incompressible hydrodynamical part of the model, (ii) we consider as data centroid velocity maps, and (iii) we let only three of the free parameters vary (namely the correlation length, the Hurst parameter and the intermittency parameter). Within this framework, we demonstrate that, given a centroid velocity map, we can find in an automated manner (i.e. by a Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis) values of the parameters such that the model resembles the given map, i.e. which reproduces its statistics fairly well. Hence, thanks to this procedure, one may characterize statistically, and thus compare, various turbulent data. In other words, we show how this model may be used as a metric to compare observational or simulated data sets. In addition, because this model is numerically particularly fast (nearly 500 times faster than the numerical simulation we use to generate our reference data) it may be used as a surrogate model. Finally, by this process we also initiate the first systematic exploration of the parameter space of this model. Doing so, we show how the parameters impact the visual and the statistical properties of centroid velocity maps, and exhibit the correlations between the various parameters, providing new insight into the model.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.