Paper detail

A method to challenge symmetries in data with self-supervised learning

Symmetries are key properties of physical models and of experimental designs, but any proposed symmetry may or may not be realized in nature. In this paper, we introduce a practical and general method to test such suspected symmetries in data, with minimal external input. Self-supervision, which derives learning objectives from data without external labelling, is used to train models to predict 'which is real?' between real data and symmetrically transformed alternatives. If these models make successful predictions in independent tests, then they challenge the targeted symmetries. Crucially, our method handles filtered data, which often arise from inefficiencies or deliberate selections, and which could give the illusion of asymmetry if mistreated. We use examples to demonstrate how the method works and how the models' predictions can be interpreted. Code and data are available at https://zenodo.org/record/6861702.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.