Paper detail

A method for subtracting foregrounds from multi-frequency CMB sky maps

An improved method for subtracting contaminants from Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) sky maps is presented, and used to estimate how well future experiments will be able to recover the primordial CMB fluctuations. We find that the naive method of subtracting foregrounds (such as dust emission, synchrotron radiation, free-free-emission, unresolved point sources, etc) on a pixel by pixel basis can be improved by more than an order of magnitude by taking advantage of the correlation of the emission in neighboring pixels. The optimal multi-frequency subtraction method improves on simple pixel-by-pixel subtraction both by taking noise-levels into account, and by exploiting the fact that most contaminants have angular power spectra that differ substantially from that of the CMB. The results are natural to visualize in the two-dimensional plane with axes defined by multipole l and frequency v. We present a brief overview of the geography of this plane, showing the regions probed by various experiments and where we expect contaminants to dominate. We illustrate the method by estimating how well the proposed ESA COBRAS/SAMBA mission will be able to recover the CMB fluctuations against contaminating foregrounds.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.