Paper detail

A method for identifying metal-poor stars with Gaia BP/RP spectra

Context. The study of the oldest and most metal-poor stars in our Galaxy promotes our understanding of the Galactic chemical evolution and the beginning of Galaxy and star formation. However, they are notoriously difficult to find, with only five stars at $\mathrm{[Fe/H]<-5.0}$ having been detected to date. Thus, the spectrophotometric data of 219 million sources which became available in the third Gaia Data Release comprise a very promising dataset for the identification of metal-poor stars. Aims. We want to use the low-resolution Gaia Blue Photometer / Red Photometer (BP/RP) spectra to identify metal-poor stars. Our primary aspiration is to help populate the poorly constrained tail of the metallicity distribution function of the stellar halo of the Galaxy. Methods. We developed a metal-poor candidate selection method based on flux ratios from the BP/RP Gaia spectra, using simulated synthetic spectra. Results. We found a relation between the relative iron abundance and the flux ratio of the Ca H \& K region to that of the $\mathrm{Hβ}$ line. This relation is temperature and surface gravity dependent, and it holds for stars with $\mathrm{4800\,K \leq T_{eff}\leq6300\,K}$. We applied it to noisy simulated synthetic spectra and inferred $\mathrm{[Fe/H]}$ with an uncertainty of $σ_{\mathrm{[Fe/H]}}\lessapprox0.65$ dex for $\mathrm{-3\leq[Fe/H]}\leq 0.5$ and G=15-17mag, which is sufficient to identify stars at $\mathrm{[Fe/H]<-2.0 }$ reliably. We predict that by selecting stars with inferred $\mathrm{[Fe/H]}\leq-2.5$ dex, we can retrieve 80% of the stars with $\mathrm{[Fe/H]}\leq-3$ and have a success rate of about 50%, that is one in two stars we select would have $\mathrm{[Fe/H]}\leq-3$. We do not take into account the effect of reddening, so our method should only be applied to stars which are located in regions of low extinction.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.