Paper detail

A method for estimating the cooperativity length in polymers

The problem of estimating the size of the cooperatively rearranging regions (CRRs) in supercooled polymeric melts from the analysis of the $α$-process in ordinary relaxation experiments is addressed. The system is treated with the canonical formalism as an ensemble of CRRs, which are described by a stationary distribution relative to the rearrangement energy threshold. The process whereby a CRR changes its configuration is viewed as consisting of two distinct steps: a reduced number of monomers reaches initially an activated state allowing for some local rearrangement; then, the regression of the energy fluctuation may take place through the configurational degrees of freedom, thus allowing for further rearrangements on larger length-scales. The latter are indeed those to which the well known Donth's scheme refers. Two main regimes are envisaged, depending on wether the role played by the configurational degrees of freedom in the regression of the energy fluctuation is significant or not. It is argued that the latter case is related to the occurrence of an arrhenian dependence of the central relaxation time. Data of the literature are rediscussed within this new framework.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.