Paper detail

A Method for Detecting Life-Threatening Signals in Serum Potassium Level after Myocardial Infarction

Clinical guidelines recommend maintaining serum potassium levels between 4.0 and 5.0 mEq/L in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). These guidelines are based on recent studies that found significant associations between crossing of absolute potassium limits (by in-hospital mean or by min/max values) and mortality. This paper investigates a different approach: we hypothesized that a change in the potassium level may be a harbinger of short survivability, rather than crossing of absolute boundaries. Our objectives were: (1) to examine if a "change in mean" indicator has the ability to distinguish between survivors and non-survivors of MI hospitalization, and if so, (2) to formulate a framework for detecting life-threatening changes in potassium level of patients hospitalized with MI. The study included 195 patients who were hospitalized for MI from 2002 to 2014, with at least 40 potassium measurements (i.e., severely ill). In a retrospective analysis we found evidence that the "change in mean" criterion significantly discriminated between survivors and non-survivors. A threshold for raising an alarm was specified by plotting an ROC curve and choosing the value that yields the best combination of sensitivity and specificity. In this case, the method detected ~80% of the patients that eventually died, while wrongly alerting for only ~40% of the survivors. The proposed approach is not intended for replacing the absolute-level protocols but to add valuable knowledge to cardiologists.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.