Paper detail

A Memristive Model Compatible with Triplet Rule for Spike-Timing-Dependent-Plasticity

In this paper, we propose an extended version of the memristive STDP model, which is one of the most important and exciting recent discoveries in neuromorphic engineering. The proposed model aims to claim compatibility with another importent STDP rule beyond the pair-based rule, known as the triplet STDP rule. This is an extension of the asynchronous memristive model of Linares-Barranco, et al., capable of explaining the pair-based rule based on the analogy of the synapse to the memristor. The proposed new model is compatible with both the pair-baed and triplet-based rule, by assuming a mechanism of variable thresholds adapting to synaptic potentiation and depression. The dynamical process is governed by ordinary differential equations. The model is an expression of Froemke's principle of suppression for triplet rules and reveals a similar time dependence with that in the suppression STDP model.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.