Paper detail

A mechanistic framework for a priori pharmacokinetic predictions of orally inhaled drugs

The fate of orally inhaled drugs is determined by pulmonary pharmacokinetic (PK) processes such as particle deposition, pulmonary drug dissolution, and mucociliary clearance. Although each single process has been systematically investigated, a quantitative understanding on their interaction remains limited and hence identifying optimal drug and formulation characteristics for orally inhaled drugs is still challenging. To investigate this complex interplay, the pulmonary processes can be integrated into mathematical models. However, existing modeling attempts considerably simplify these processes or are not systematically evaluated against (clinical) data. In this work, we developed a mathematical framework based on physiologically-structured population equations to integrate all relevant pulmonary processes mechanistically. A tailored numerical resolution strategy was chosen and the mechanistic model was evaluated systematically against different clinical datasets. Without any parameter estimation based on individual study data, the developed model simultaneously predicted (1) lung retention profiles of inhaled insoluble particles, (2) particle size-dependent PK of inhaled monodisperse particles, (3) PK differences between inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide, and (4) PK differences between healthy volunteers and asthmatic patients. Finally, to identify the most impactful optimization criteria for orally inhaled drugs, we investigated the impact of input parameters on both pulmonary and systemic exposure. Solubility of the inhaled drug did not have any relevant impact on local and systemic PK. Instead, pulmonary dissolution rate, particle size, tissue affinity, and systemic clearance were impactful potential optimization parameters. In the future, the developed prediction framework should be considered a powerful tool to identify optimal drug and formulation characteristics.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.