Paper detail

A measurement of the total cross section of $σ_{Zh}$ at a future $e^{+}e^{-}$ collider using the hadronic decay mode of $Z$

A feasibility to use the hadronic decay mode of $Z$ for the model independant measurement of the total cross section of Higgs-strahlung process $(σ_{Zh})$ at a future $e^+e^-$ collider was studied. For the recoil mass measurement from hadronic decay of $Z$, a simple cut based analysis was applied on samples produced by the ILD full detector simulation at $\sqrt{s}=350$ GeV and 500 GeV using the ILC beam parameters. At $350$ GeV, a bump in the recoil mass distribution was reconstructed, and $Δσ_{Zh}/σ_{Zh}$ = 3.4% was obtained assuming 165 fb$^{-1}$ data with $e^-(e^+)$ beam polarization of -80%(+30%) and +80%(-30%), respectively. At $500$ GeV, clear Higgs boson peak in the recoil mass distribution was not seen, however, from the excess of the events, $Δσ_{Zh}/σ_{Zh}=3.9%$ was obtained assuming 500 fb$^{-1}$ data with $e^-(e^+)$ beam polarization of -80%(+30%).

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.