Paper detail

A Measurement Model for Precision Pulsar Timing

This paper describes a comprehensive measurement model for the error budget of pulse arrival times with emphasis on intrinsic pulse jitterand plasma propagation effects (particularly interstellar scattering), which are stochastic in time and have diverse dependences on radio frequency. To reduce their contribution, timing measurements can be made over a range of frequencies that depends on a variety of pulsar and instrumentation-dependent factors that we identify. A salient trend for high signal-to-noise measurements of millisecond pulsars is that time-of-arrival precision is limited either by irreducible interstellar scattering or by pulse-phase jitter caused by variable emission within pulsar magnetospheres. A cap on timing errors implies that pulsars must be confined to low dispersion measures (DMs) and observed at high frequencies. Use of wider bandwidths that increase signal-to-noise ratios will degrade timing precision if nondispersive chromatic effects are not mitigated. The allowable region in the DM-frequency plane depends on how chromatic timing perturbations are addressed. Without mitigation, observations at 1.4~GHz or 5~GHz are restricted to $\DM\lesssim 30$ and $\lesssim 100~\DMu$, respectively. With aggressive mitigation of interstellar scattering and use of large telescopes to provide adequate sensitivity at high frequencies (e.g. Arecibo, FAST, phase 1 of the SKA, and the SKA), pulsars with DMs up to 500~$\DMu$ can be used in precision timing applications. We analyze methods that fit arrival times vs. frequency at a given epoch prior to multi-epoch fitting. While the terms of greatest astrophysical interest are achromatic (e.g. orbital and gravitational wave perturbations), measurements may ultimately be limited by similarly achromatic stochasticity in a pulsar's spin rate.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.