Paper detail

A measure estimate in geometry of numbers and improvements to Dirichlet's theorem

Let $ψ$ be a continuous decreasing function defined on all large positive real numbers. We say that a real $m\times n$ matrix $A$ is $ψ$-Dirichlet if for every sufficiently large real number $t$ one can find $\boldsymbol{p} \in \mathbb{Z}^m$, $\boldsymbol{q} \in \mathbb{Z}^n\smallsetminus\{\boldsymbol{0}\}$ satisfying $\|A\boldsymbol{q}-\boldsymbol{p}\|^m< ψ({t})$ and $\|\boldsymbol{q}\|^n<{t}$. This property was introduced by Kleinbock and Wadleigh in 2018, generalizing the property of $A$ being Dirichlet improvable which dates back to Davenport and Schmidt (1969). In the present paper, we give sufficient conditions on $ψ$ to ensure that the set of $ψ$-Dirichlet matrices has zero or full Lebesgue measure. Our proof is dynamical and relies on the effective equidistribution and doubly mixing of certain expanding horospheres in the space of lattices. Another main ingredient of our proof is an asymptotic measure estimate for certain compact neighborhoods of the critical locus (with respect to the supremum norm) in the space of lattices. Our method also works for the analogous weighted problem where the relevant supremum norms are replaced by certain weighted quasi-norms.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.