Paper detail

A maximum likelihood method to correct for missed levels based on the $Δ_3(L)$ statistic

The $Δ_3(L)$ statistic of Random Matrix Theory is defined as the average of a set of random numbers $\{δ\}$, derived from a spectrum. The distribution $p(δ)$ of these random numbers is used as the basis of a maximum likelihood method to gauge the fraction $x$ of levels missed in an experimental spectrum. The method is tested on an ensemble of depleted spectra from the gaussian orthogonal ensemble (GOE), and accurately returned the correct fraction of missed levels. Neutron resonance data and acoustic spectra of an aluminum block were analyzed. All results were compared with an analysis based on an established expression for $Δ_3(L)$ for a depleted GOE spectrum. The effects of intruder levels is examined, and seen to be very similar to that of missed levels. Shell model spectra were seen to give the same $p(δ)$ as the GOE.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.