Paper detail

A Mathematical Treatment of the Offset Microlensing Degeneracy

The offset microlensing degeneracy, recently proposed by Zhang et al. (2022), has been shown to generalize the close-wide and inner-outer caustic degeneracies into a unified regime of magnification degeneracy in the interpretation of 2-body planetary microlensing observations. While the inner-outer degeneracy expects the source trajectory to pass equidistant to the planetary caustics of the degenerate lens configurations, the offset degeneracy states that the same mathematical expression applies to any combination of the close, wide, and resonant caustic topologies, where the projected star-planet separations differ by an offset ($s_{\rm A}\neq s_{\rm B}$) that depends on where the source trajectory crosses the star-planet axis. An important implication is that the $s_{\rm A}=1/s_{\rm B}$ solution of the close-wide degeneracy never strictly manifests in observations except when the source crosses a singular point near the primary. Nevertheless, the offset degeneracy was proposed upon numerical calculations, and no theoretical justification was given. Here, we provide a theoretical treatment of the offset degeneracy, which demonstrates its nature as a mathematical degeneracy. From first principles, we show that the offset degeneracy formalism is exact to zeroth-order in the mass ratio ($q$) for two cases: when the source crosses the lens-axis inside of caustics, and for $(s_{\rm A}-s_{\rm B})^6\ll1$ when crossing outside of caustics. The extent to which the offset degeneracy persists in oblique source trajectories is explored numerically. Lastly, it is shown that the superposition principle allows for a straightforward generalization to $N$-body microlenses with $N-1$ planetary lens components ($q\ll1$), which results in a $2^{N-1}$-fold degeneracy.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.