Paper detail

A mass of less than 15 solar masses for the black hole in an ultraluminous X-ray source

Most ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs) display a typical set of properties not seen in Galactic stellar-mass black holes (BHs): higher luminosity Lx > 3 10^39 erg/s, unusually soft X-ray components (kT < 0.3 keV) and a characteristic downturn in their spectra above ~ 5 keV. Such puzzling properties have been interpreted either as evidence of intermediate-mass BHs, or as emission from stellar-mass BHs accreting above their Eddington limit, analogous to some Galactic BHs at peak luminosity. Recently, a very soft X-ray spectrum has been observed in a rare and transient stellar-mass BH. Here we show that the X-ray source P13 in the galaxy NGC\,7793 is in a ~ 64 day period binary and exhibits all three canonical properties of ULXs. By modelling the strong optical and UV modulations due to X-ray heating of the B9Ia donor star, we constrain the BH mass to less than 15 solar masses. Our results demonstrate that in P13, soft thermal emission and spectral curvature are indeed signatures of supercritical accretion. By analogy, ULXs with similar X-ray spectra and luminosities of up to a few 10^40 erg/s can be explained by supercritical accretion onto massive stellar BHs.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.