Paper detail

A Markov theoretic description of stacking disordered aperiodic crystals including ice and opaline silica

We review the Markov theoretic description of 1D aperiodic crystals, describing the stacking-faulted crystal polytype as a special case of an aperiodic crystal. Under this description we generalise the centrosymmetric unit cell underlying a topologically centrosymmetric crystal to a reversible Markov chain underlying a reversible aperiodic crystal. We show that for the close-packed structure, almost all stackings are irreversible when the interaction reichweite is greater than 4. Moreover, we present an analytic expression of the scattering cross section of a large class of stacking disordered aperiodic crystals, lacking translational symmetry of their layers, including ice and opaline silica (opal CT). We then relate the observed stackings and their underlying reichweite to the physics of various nucleation and growth processes of disordered ice.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.