Paper detail

A Machine Learning Approach to Automatic Classification of Eight Sleep Disorders

In this research, we attempt to answer the following basic research questions: Is a machine learning model able to classify all types of sleep disorders with high accuracy? Among the different modalities of sleep disorder signals, are some more important than others? Do raw signals improve the performance of a deep learning model when they are used as inputs? Prior research showed that most sleep disorders belong to eight categories. To study the performance of machine learning models in classifying polysomnography recordings into the eight categories of sleep pathologies, we selected the Cyclic Alternating Pattern Sleep Database. We developed a multi-channel Deep Learning model where a set of Convolutional Neural Networks were applied to six channels of raw signals of different modalities, including three channels of EEG signals and one channel each of EMG, ECG , and EOG signals. To compare the performance of the DL model with other models, we designed a model that took spectral features, instead of raw signals, as its inputs. We first studied the "importance" issue of signal modalities using the RF algorithm. We found that ECG contributed most to the important features and EMG second, among the four signal modalities. We then studied the accuracy performance of the proposed machine learning models. We verified that the multi-channel DL-R model, which took raw signals as its inputs, outperformed all other models, with its sensitivity and specificity scores both being above 95 %. This accuracy performance is on a par with those published results which dealt with fewer types of sleep disorders. We adopted two popular heatmap-generating techniques, with which we confirmed that the DL model's superior performance was owing to the CNN network's ability to extract potent features from raw signals.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.