Paper detail

A Lower Limit on the Halo Mass to form Supermassive Black Holes

We consider a scenario where supermassive black holes form through direct accumulation of gas at the centre of proto-galaxies. In the first stage, the accumulated gas forms a super-massive star whose core collapses when the nuclear fuel is exhausted, forming a black hole of $M_{\rm BH} \approx 100 M_{\sun}$. As the black hole starts accreting, it inflates the surrounding dense gas into an almost hydrostatic self-gravitating envelope, with at least 10-100 times the mass of the hole. We find that these "quasistars" suffer extremely high rates of mass loss through winds from their envelopes, in analogy to very massive stars such as eta-Carinae. Only for envelope masses greater than 2.8 \times 10^{5} (M_{\rm BH}/100 M_{\sun})^{9/11} is the envelope evaporation time-scale longer than the accretion time-scale of the black hole. This relation thus constitutes a "threshold growth line" above which quasistars can grow their internal black holes. Accretion rates can be 10 to 100 times the Eddington rate. The quasistars born in this "growth region" with 10^7-10^8 M_{\sun} can grow black holes with masses between 10^4$ to $10^5 M_{\sun}, before crossing the threshold growth line and dispersing their envelopes in less than $10^4$ yr. This scenario therefore predicts that massive black hole seeds can be found only in dark matter halos with total masses larger than about 10^9 M_{\sun}, which can provide sufficiently high accretion rates to form such massive quasistars.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.