Paper detail

A Lower Bound Theorem for strongly regular CW spheres with up to $2d+1$ vertices

In 1967, Grünmbaum conjectured that any $d$-dimensional polytope with $d+s\leq 2d$ vertices has at least \[ϕ_k(d+s,d) = {d+1 \choose k+1 }+{d \choose k+1 }-{d+1-s \choose k+1 } \] $k$-faces. This conjecture along with the characterization of equality cases was recently proved by the author. In this paper, several extensions of this result are established. Specifically, it is proved that lattices with the diamond property (for example, abstract polytopes) and $d+s\leq 2d$ atoms have at least $ϕ_k(d+s,d)$ elements of rank $k+1$. Furthermore, in the case of face lattices of strongly regular CW complexes representing normal pseudomanifolds with up to $2d$ vertices, a characterization of equality cases is given. Finally, sharp lower bounds on the number of $k$-faces of strongly regular CW complexes representing normal pseudomanifolds with $2d+1$ vertices are obtained. These bounds are given by the face numbers of certain polytopes with $2d+1$ vertices.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.