Paper detail

A lower bound for splines on tetrahedral vertex stars

A tetrahedral complex all of whose tetrahedra meet at a common vertex is called a \textit{vertex star}. Vertex stars are a natural generalization of planar triangulations, and understanding splines on vertex stars is a crucial step to analyzing trivariate splines. It is particularly difficult to compute the dimension of splines on vertex stars in which the vertex is completely surrounded by tetrahedra -- we call these \textit{closed} vertex stars. A formula due to Alfeld, Neamtu, and Schumaker gives the dimension of $C^r$ splines on closed vertex stars of degree at least $3r+2$. We show that this formula is a lower bound on the dimension of $C^r$ splines of degree at least $(3r+2)/2$. Our proof uses apolarity and the so-called \textit{Waldschmidt constant} of the set of points dual to the interior faces of the vertex star. We also use an argument of Whiteley to show that the only splines of degree at most $(3r+1)/2$ on a generic closed vertex star are global polynomials.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.