Paper detail

A Lower Bound for Estimating High Moments of a Data Stream

We show an improved lower bound for the Fp estimation problem in a data stream setting for p>2. A data stream is a sequence of items from the domain [n] with possible repetitions. The frequency vector x is an n-dimensional non-negative integer vector x such that x(i) is the number of occurrences of i in the sequence. Given an accuracy parameter Omega(n^{-1/p}) < ε< 1, the problem of estimating Fp is to estimate \norm{x}_p^p = \sum_{i \in [n]} \abs{x(i)}^p correctly to within a relative accuracy of 1\pm εwith high constant probability in an online fashion and using as little space as possible. The current space lower bound for this problem is Omega(n^{1-2/p} ε^{-2/p}+ n^{1-2/p}ε^{-4/p}/ \log^{O(1)}(n)+ (ε^{-2} + \log (n))). The first term in the lower bound expression was proved in \cite{B-YJKS:stoc02,cks:ccc03}, the second in \cite{wz:arxiv11} and the third in \cite{wood:soda04}. In this note, we show an Omega(p^2 n^{1-2/p} ε^{-2}/\log (n)) bits space bound, for Omega(pn^{-1/p}) \le ε\le 1/10.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.