Paper detail

A linear k-fold Cheeger inequality

Given an undirected graph $G$, the classical Cheeger constant, $h_G$, measures the optimal partition of the vertices into 2 parts with relatively few edges between them based upon the sizes of the parts. The well-known Cheeger's inequality states that $2 λ_1 \le h_G \le \sqrt {2 λ_1}$ where $λ_1$ is the minimum nontrivial eigenvalue of the normalized Laplacian matrix. Recent work has generalized the concept of the Cheeger constant when partitioning the vertices of a graph into $k > 2$ parts. While there are several approaches, recent results have shown these higher-order Cheeger constants to be tightly controlled by $λ_{k-1}$, the $(k-1)$-th nontrivial eigenvalue, to within a quadratic factor. We present a new higher-order Cheeger inequality with several new perspectives. First, we use an alternative higher-order Cheeger constant which considers an "average case" approach. We show this measure is related to the average of the first $k-1$ nontrivial eigenvalues of the normalized Laplacian matrix. Further, using recent techniques, our results provide linear inequalities using the $\infty$-norms of the corresponding eigenvectors. Consequently, unlike previous results, this result is relevant even when $λ_{k-1} \to 1$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.