Paper detail

A light-curve analysis of the X-ray flash first observed in classical novae

An X-ray flash, expected in a very early phase of a nova outburst, was at last detected with the {\it SRG}/eROSITA in the classical nova YZ Reticuli 2020. The observed flash timescale, luminosity, and blackbody temperature substantially constrain the nova model. We present light curve models of the X-ray flash for various white dwarf (WD) masses and mass accretion rates. We have found the WD mass in YZ Ret to be as massive as $M_{\rm WD}\sim 1.3 ~M_\odot$ with mass accretion rates of $\dot M_{\rm acc}\sim 5 \times 10^{-10}- 5\times 10^{-9} ~M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ including the case that the mass accretion rate is changing between them, to be consistent with the {\it SRG}/eROSITA observation. The X-ray observation confirms the luminosity to be close to the Eddington limit at the X-ray flash. The occurrence of optically thick winds, with the photospheric radius exceeding $\sim 0.1~R_\odot$, terminated the X-ray flash of YZ Ret by strong absorption. This sets a constrain on the starting time of wind mass loss. A slight contamination of the core material into the hydrogen rich envelope seems to be preferred to explain a very short duration of the X-ray flash.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.