Paper detail

A Large Sample Study of Red Giants in the Globular Cluster Omega Centauri (NGC 5139)

We present abundances of several light, alpha, Fe-peak, and neutron-capture elements for 66 red giant branch (RGB) stars in the Galactic globular cluster Omega Centauri. Our observations lie in the range 12.0<V<13.5 and focus on the intermediate and metal-rich RGBs. We find that there are at least four peaks in the metallicity distribution function at [Fe/H]=-1.75, -1.45, -1.05, and -0.75, which correspond to about 55%, 30%, 10%, and 5% of our sample, respectively. Additionally, the most metal-rich stars are the most centrally located. Na and Al are correlated despite exhibiting star-to-star dispersions of more than a factor of 10, but the distribution of those elements appears to be metallicity dependent and are divided at [Fe/H]~-1.2. About 40-50% of stars with [Fe/H]<-1.2 have Na and Al abundances consistent with production solely in Type II supernovae and match observations of disk and halo stars at comparable metallicity. The remaining metal-poor stars are enhanced in Na and Al compared to their disk and halo counterparts and are mostly consistent with predicted yields from >5 M_sun asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars. At [Fe/H]>-1.2, more than 75% of the stars are Na/Al enhanced and may have formed almost exclusively from AGB ejecta. Most of these stars are enhanced in Na by at least 0.2 dex for a given Al abundance than would be expected based on "normal" globular cluster values. All stars in our sample are alpha-rich and have solar-scaled Fe-peak abundances. Eu does not vary extensively as a function of metallicity; however, [La/Fe] varies from about -0.4 to +2 and stars with [Fe/H]>-1.5 have [La/Eu] values indicating domination by the s-process. A quarter of our sample have [La/Eu]>+1 and may be the result of mass transfer in a binary system.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.