Paper detail

A large range of haziness conditions in hot-Jupiter atmospheres

We present a study of photochemical hazes of exoplanet atmospheres based on a self-consistent model including haze microphysics, disequilibrium chemistry, and radiative feedbacks. We derive the haze properties required to match HST observations of ten hot-Jupiters. HAT-P-12b, HD-189733b, HD-209458b and WASP-6b require haze mass fluxes between 5x10$^{-15}$ and 9x10$^{-12} g.cm^{-2}.s^{-1}$ to match the observations. WASP-12b and WASP-19b with equilibrium temperatures above 2000 K are incompatible with the presence of haze and are better fitted by heavy metals. HAT-P-1b and WASP-31b do not show clear evidence for the presence of hazes with upper mass fluxes of 10$^{-15}$ and 10$^{-16}g.cm^{-2}.s^{-1}$, respectively, while WASP-17b and WASP-39b present an upper mass flux limit of 10$^{-16} g.cm^{-2}.s^{-1}$. We discuss the implications of the self-consistent model and we derive upper limits for the haze abundances based on photochemistry results. Our results suggest HCN as the main haze precursor up to 1300 K effective temperatures and CO above. Our derived haze mass fluxes based on the fit to the observations are consistent with the photochemistry with formation yields up to $\sim$6.4\%. Disequilibrium chemistry has negligible impact on the spectra considering the low resolution observations used but impacts the chemical composition and temperature profiles. We find that hazes produce hotter upper atmosphere temperatures with a detectable impact on the spectra. Clouds may have implications for interpreting the transit spectra of HD-209458b, WASP-31b and WASP-39b. Nevertheless, the presence of silicate and iron clouds is expected in all studied atmospheres except WASP-12b and WASP-19b.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.