Paper detail

A large population study of protoplanetary disks: Explaining the millimeter size-luminosity relation with or without sub-structure

Recent sub-arcsecond resolution surveys of the dust continuum emission from nearby protoplanetary disks showed a strong correlation between the sizes and luminosities of the disks. We aim to explain the origin of the (sub-)millimeter size-luminosity relation (SLR) between the $68\%$ effective radius ($r_{eff}$) of disks with their continuum luminosity ($L_{mm}$), with models of gas and dust evolution in a simple viscous accretion disk and radiative transfer calculations. We use a large grid of models ($10^{5}$ simulations) with and without planetary gaps, varying the initial conditions of the key parameters. We calculate the disk continuum emission and the effective radius for all models as a function of time. By selecting those simulations that continuously follow the SLR, we can derive constraints on the input parameters of the models. We confirm previous results that models of smooth disks in the radial drift regime are compatible with the observed SLR ($L_{mm}\propto r_{eff}^{2}$) but only smooth disks cannot be the reality. We show that the SLR is more widely populated if planets are present. However they tend to follow a different relation than smooth disks, potentially implying that a mixture of smooth and sub-structured disks are present in the observed sample. We derive a SLR ($L_{mm}\propto r_{eff}^{5/4}$) for disks with strong sub-structure. To be compatible with the SLR, models need to have an initially high disk mass ($\geq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-2}M_{\star}$) and low turbulence-parameter $α$ values ($\leq 10^{-3}$). Furthermore, we find that the grain composition and porosity drastically affects the evolution of disks on the size-luminosity diagram where relatively compact grains that include amorphous carbon are favoured. Moreover, a uniformly optically thick disk with high albedo ($0.9$) that follows the SLR cannot be formed from an evolutionary procedure.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.