Paper detail

A large narrow band H$α$ survey at $z\sim0.2$: the bright end of the luminosity function, cosmic variance and clustering across cosmic time

We carried out the largest ($>3.5\times10^5$ Mpc$^3$, 26 deg$^2$) H$α$ narrow band survey to date at $z\sim0.2$ in the SA22, W2 and XMMLSS extragalactic fields. Our survey covers a large enough volume to overcome cosmic variance and to sample bright and rare H$α$ emitters up to an observed luminosity of $\sim10^{42.4}$ erg s$^{-1}$, equivalent to $\sim11 M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$. Using our sample of $220$ sources brighter than $>10^{41.4}$ erg s$^{-1}$ ($>1 M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$), we derive H$α$ luminosity functions, which are well described by a Schechter function with $ϕ^* = 10^{-2.85\pm0.03}$ Mpc$^{-3}$ and $L^*_{Hα} = 10^{41.71\pm0.02}$ erg s$^{-1}$ (with a fixed faint end slope $α=-1.35$). We find that surveys probing smaller volumes ($\sim3\times10^4$ Mpc$^3$) are heavily affected by cosmic variance, which can lead to errors of over $100$ per cent in the characteristic density and luminosity of the H$α$ luminosity function. We derive a star formation rate density of $ρ_\mathrm{SFRD} = 0.0094\pm0.0008$ $M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$, in agreement with the redshift-dependent H$α$ parametrisation from Sobral et al. (2013). The two-point correlation function is described by a single power law $ω(θ) = (0.159\pm0.012) θ^{(-0.75\pm0.05)}$, corresponding to a clustering length of $r_0 = 3.3\pm0.8$ Mpc/h. We find that the most luminous H$α$ emitters at $z\sim0.2$ are more strongly clustered than the relatively fainter ones. The $L^*_{Hα}$ H$α$ emitters at $z\sim0.2$ in our sample reside in $\sim10^{12.5-13.5}$ $M_\odot$ dark matter haloes. This implies that the most star forming galaxies always reside in relatively massive haloes or group-like environments and that the typical host halo mass of star-forming galaxies is independent of redshift if scaled by $L_\mathrm{Hα}/L^*_{Hα}(z)$, as proposed by Sobral et al. (2010).

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.