Paper detail

A Lagrangian perspective on the stability of ideal MHD equilibria with flow

We take a careful look at two approaches to deriving stability criteria for ideal MHD equilibria. One is based on a tedious analysis of the linearized equations of motion, while the other examines the second variation of the MHD Hamiltonian computed with proper variational constraints. For equilibria without flow, the two approaches are known to be fully consistent. However, for equilibria with flow, the stability criterion obtained from the constrained variation approach was claimed to be stronger than that derived using the linearized equations of motion. We show this claim is incorrect by deriving and comparing both criteria within the same framework. It turns out that the criterion obtained from the constrained variation approach has stricter requirements on the initial perturbations than the other. Such requirements naturally emerge in our new treatment of the constrained variation approach using the Euler-Poincaré structure of ideal MHD, which is more direct and simple than the previous derivation from the Poisson perspective.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.