Paper detail

A Lagrangian Dynamical Theory for the Mass Function of Cosmic Structures: II Statistics

The statistical tools needed to obtain a mass function from realistic collapse time estimates are presented. Collapse dynamics has been dealt with in paper I of this series by means of the powerful Lagrangian perturbation theory and the simple ellipsoidal collapse model. The basic quantity considered here is the inverse collapse time F; it is a non-linear functional of the initial potential, with a non-Gaussian distribution. In the case of sharp k-space smoothing, it is demonstrated that the fraction of collapsed mass can be determined by extending to the F process the diffusion formalism introduced by Bond et al. (1991). The problem is then reduced to a random walk with a moving absorbing barrier, and numerically solved; an accurate analytical fit, valid for small and moderate resolutions, is found. For Gaussian smoothing, the F trajectories are strongly correlated in resolution. In this case, an approximation proposed by Peacock & Heavens (1990) can be used to determine the mass functions. Gaussian smoothing is preferred, as it optimizes the performances of dynamical predictions and stabilizes the F trajectories. The relation between resolution and mass is treated at a heuristic level, and the consequences of this approximation are discussed. The resulting mass functions, compared to the classical Press & Schechter (1974) one, are shifted toward large masses (confirming the findings of Monaco 1995), and tend to give more intermediate-mass objects at the expense of small-mass objects. However, the small-mass part of the mass function, which depends on uncertain dynamics and is likely to be affected by uncertainties in the resolution--mass relation, is not considered a robust prediction of this theory.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.