Paper detail

A lack of close binaries among hot horizontal branch stars in globular clusters. II. NGC\,2808

Models based on their binary origin have been very successful in reproducing the properties of field subdwarf-B stars, but the observations of their analogues in globular clusters has posed new problems, while the discovery of multiple populations offered an appealing alternative scenario for the formation of these stars. We search for binaries of period P<200 days among a sample of blue horizontal branch stars (Teff=12000-22000 K) in NGC2808, a cluster known to host three distinct stellar populations and a multimodal horizontal branch. The final sample consists of 64 targets. The radial velocity of the targets was measured in fourteen epochs, spanning a temporal interval of about 75 days. We detect no RV variable object among stars cooler than the photometric G1 gap at 17000 K, while two close (P<10 days) and two intermediate-period (P=10-50 days) systems are found among hotter targets. The close and intermediate-period binary fraction for stars cooler than the gap are fc<5% and fip<10%, respectively, with 95% confidence. The most probable values among hotter stars are fc~20% and fip~30%, but the 90%- confidence level intervals are large (6-42% and 11-72%, respectively). The G1 gap appears as a discontinuity in the binary faction, with a higher incidence of binaries among hotter stars, but a constant increase in f with temperature rather than a discontinuity cannot be excluded from our observations. We find that intermediate-period binaries, never investigated before among cluster HB stars, could play an important role, being more than ~15-20% of the hottest stars of our sample. Our results indicate that fc among hot HB stars is most probably higher for younger clusters, confirming the recently proposed age-fc relation. However, the large observed difference in binary fraction between clusters (e.g. NGC2808 and NGC6752) is still not reproduced by binary population synthesis models.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.