Paper detail

A Knapsack Intersection Hierarchy Applied to All-or-Nothing Flow in Trees

We introduce a natural knapsack intersection hierarchy for strengthening linear programming relaxations of packing integer programs, i.e., $\max\{w^Tx:x\in P\cap\{0,1\}^n\}$ where $P=\{x\in[0,1]^n:Ax \leq b\}$ and $A,b,w\ge0$. The $t^{th}$ level $P^{t}$ corresponds to adding cuts associated with the integer hull of the intersection of any $t$ knapsack constraints (rows of the constraint matrix). This model captures the maximum possible strength of "$t$-row cuts", an approach often used by solvers for small $t$. If $A$ is $m \times n$, then $P^m$ is the integer hull of $P$ and $P^1$ corresponds to adding cuts for each associated single-row knapsack problem. Thus, even separating over $P^1$ is NP-hard. However, for fixed $t$ and any $ε>0$, results of Pritchard imply there is a polytime $(1+ε)$-approximation for $P^{t}$. We then investigate the hierarchy's strength in the context of the well-studied all-or-nothing flow problem in trees (also called unsplittable flow on trees). For this problem, we show that the integrality gap of $P^t$ is $O(n/t)$ and give examples where the gap is $Ω(n/t)$. We then examine the stronger formulation $P_{\text{rank}}$ where all rank constraints are added. For $P_{\text{rank}}^t$, our best lower bound drops to $Ω(1/c)$ at level $t=n^c$ for any $c>0$. Moreover, on a well-known class of "bad instances" due to Friggstad and Gao, we show that we can achieve this gap; hence a constant integrality gap for these instances is obtained at level $n^c$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.