Paper detail

A kinetic interpretation of the classical Rayleigh-Taylor instability

Rayleigh-Taylor (RT) instabilities are prevalent in many physical regimes ranging from astrophysical to laboratory plasmas and have primarily been studied using fluid models, the majority of which have been ideal fluid models. This work is the first of its kind to present a 5-dimensional (2 spatial dimensions, 3 velocity space dimensions) simulation using the continuum-kinetic model to study the effect of the collisional mean-free-path and transport on the instability growth. The continuum-kinetic model provides noise-free access to the full particle distribution function permitting a detailed investigation of the role of kinetic physics in hydrodynamic phenomena such as the RT instability. For long mean-free-path, there is no RT instability growth, but as collisionality increases, particles relax towards the Maxwellian velocity distribution, and the kinetic simulations reproduce the fluid simulation results. An important and novel contribution of this work is in the intermediate collisional cases that are not accessible with traditional fluid models and require kinetic modeling. Simulations of intermediate collisional cases show that the RT instability evolution is significantly altered compared to the highly collisional fluid-like cases. Specifically, the growth rate of the intermediate collisionality RT instability is lower than the high collisionality case while also producing a significantly more diffused interface. The higher moments of the distribution function play a more significant role relative to inertial terms for intermediate collisionality during the evolution of the RT instability interface. Particle energy-flux is calculated from moments of the distribution and shows that transport is significantly altered in the intermediate collisional case and deviates much more so from the high collisionality limit of the fluid regime.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.