Paper detail

A kinetic energy--and entropy-preserving scheme for compressible two-phase flows

Accurate numerical modeling of compressible flows, particularly in the turbulent regime, requires a method that is non-dissipative and stable at high Reynolds ($Re$) numbers. For a compressible flow, it is known that discrete conservation of kinetic energy is not a sufficient condition for numerical stability, unlike in incompressible flows. In this study, we adopt the recently developed conservative diffuse-interface method (Jain, Mani $\&$ Moin, $\textit{J. Comput. Phys.}$, 2020) along with the five-equation model for the simulation of compressible two-phase flows. This method discretely conserves the mass of each phase, momentum, and total energy of the system. We here propose discrete consistency conditions between the numerical fluxes, such that any set of numerical fluxes that satisfy these conditions would not spuriously contribute to the kinetic energy and entropy of the system. We also present a set of numerical fluxes\textemdash which satisfies these consistency conditions\textemdash that results in an exact conservation of kinetic energy and approximate conservation of entropy in the absence of pressure work, viscosity, thermal diffusion effects, and time-discretization errors. Since the model consistently reduces to the single-phase Navier-Stokes system when the properties of the two phases are identical, the proposed consistency conditions and numerical fluxes are also applicable for a broader class of single-phase flows. To this end, we present coarse-grid numerical simulations of compressible single-phase and two-phase turbulent flows at infinite $Re$, to illustrate the stability of the proposed method in canonical test cases, such as an isotropic turbulence and Taylor-Green vortex flows. A higher-resolution simulation of a droplet-laden compressible decaying isotropic turbulence is also presented, and the effect of the presence of droplets on the flow is analyzed.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.