Paper detail

A Kind of Representation of Common Knowledge and its Application in Requirements Analysis

Since the birth of software engineering, it always are recognized as one pure engineering subject, therefore, the foundational scientific problems are not paid much attention. This paper proposes that Requirements Analysis, the kernel process of software engineering, can be modeled based on the concept of "common knowledge". Such a model would make us understand the nature of this process. This paper utilizes the formal language as the tool to characterize the "common knowledge"-based Requirements Analysis model, and theoretically proves that : 1) the precondition of success of software projects regardless of cost would be that the participants in a software project have fully known the requirement specification, if the participants do not understand the meaning of the other participants; 2) the precondition of success of software projects regardless of cost would be that the union set of knowledge of basic facts of the participants in a software project can fully cover the requirement specification, if the participants can always understand the meaning of the other participants. These two theorems may have potential meanings to propose new software engineering methodology.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.