Paper detail

A Joint Ranking Statistic for Multi-messenger Astronomical Searches with Gravitational Waves

Joint ranking statistics are used to distinguish real from random coincidences, ideally considering whether shared parameters are consistent with each other as well as whether the individual candidates are distinguishable from noise. We expand on previous works to include additional shared parameters, we use galaxy catalogues aspriors for sky localization and distance, and avoid some approximations previously used. We develop methods to calculate this statistic both in low-latency using HEALPix sky maps, as well as with posterior samples. We show that these changes lead to a factor of one to two orders of magnitude improvement for GW170817-GRB 170817A depending on the method used, placing this significant event further into the foreground. We also examined the more tenuous joint candidate GBM-GW150914, which was largely penalized by these methods. Finally, we performed a simplistic simulation that argues these changes could better help distinguish between real and random coincidences in searches, although more realistic simulations are needed to confirm this.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.