Paper detail

A hybrid post-Newtonian -- effective-one-body scheme for spin-precessing compact-binary waveforms

We introduce \texttt{TEOBResumSP}: an efficient, accurate hybrid scheme for generating gravitational waveforms from spin-precessing compact binaries. The precessing waveforms are generated via the established technique of Euler rotating the non-precessing \texttt{TEOBResumS} waveforms from a precessing frame to an inertial frame. We obtain the Euler angles by solving the post-Newtonian precession equations expanded to second post-Newtonian order. Current version of \texttt{TEOBResumSP} produces precessing waveforms through the inspiral phase up to the onset of the merger. We compare \texttt{TEOBResumSP} to current state-of-the-art precessing approximants \texttt{NRSur7dq4}, \texttt{SEOBNRv4PHM}, and \texttt{IMRPhenomPv3HM} for 200 cases of precessing compact binary inspirals with orbital inclinations up to 90 degrees, mass ratios up to four, and the effective precession parameter $χ_p$ up to 0.75. We further provide an extended comparison with \texttt{SEOBNRv4PHM} involving 1030 more inspirals with $χ_p\le 1$ and mass ratios up to 10. We find that 91\% of the \texttt{TEOBResumSP}-\texttt{NRSur7dq4} matches, 85\% of the \texttt{TEOBResumSP}-\texttt{SEOBNRv4PHM} matches, and 77\% of the \texttt{TEOBResumSP}-\texttt{IMRPhenomPv3HM} matches are greater than $0.965$. Most disagreements occur for large mass ratios and $χ_p \gtrsim 0.6$. We identify the mismatch of the \emph{non}-precessing $(2,1)$ mode as one of the leading causes of disagreements. We also introduce a new parameter, $χ_{\perp,\text{max}}$, to measure the strength of precession and hint that the mismatch between the above approximants shows an exponential dependence on $χ_{\perp,\text{max}}$ though this requires further study. Our results indicate that \texttt{TEOBResumSP} is on its way to becoming a robust precessing approximant to be employed in the parameter estimation of generic-spin compact binaries.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.