Paper detail

A Hybrid Approach to Web Service Recommendation Based on QoS-Aware Rating and Ranking

As the number of Web services with the same or similar functions increases steadily on the Internet, nowadays more and more service consumers pay great attention to the non-functional properties of Web services, also known as quality of service (QoS), when finding and selecting appropriate Web services. For most of the QoS-aware Web service recommendation systems, the list of recommended Web services is generally obtained based on a rating-oriented prediction approach, aiming at predicting the potential ratings that an active user may assign to the unrated services as accurately as possible. However, in some application scenarios, high accuracy of rating prediction may not necessarily lead to a satisfactory recommendation result. In this paper, we propose a ranking-oriented hybrid approach by combining the item-based collaborative filtering and latent factor models to address the problem of Web services ranking. In particular, the similarity between two Web services is measured in terms of the correlation coefficient between their rankings instead of between the traditional QoS ratings. Besides, we also improve the measure NDCG (Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain) for evaluating the accuracy of the top K recommendations returned in ranked order. Comprehensive experiments on the QoS data set composed of real-world Web services are conducted to test our approach, and the experimental results demonstrate that our approach outperforms other competing approaches.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.