Paper detail

A hybrid approach to modelling large area field emitters

Large area field electron emitters, typically consisting of several thousands of nanotips, pose a major challenge since numerical modeling requires enormous computational resources. We propose a hybrid approach where the local electrostatic field enhancement parameters of an individual emitter is determined numerically while electrostatic shielding and anode-proximity effects are incorporated using recent analytical advances. The hybrid model is tested numerically on an ordered arrangement of emitters and then applied to recent experimental results on randomly distributed gold nanocones. Using the current-voltage data of two samples with vastly different emitter densities but having similar nanocone sizes, we show that an appropriate modeling of the emitter-apex together with the analytical results on shielding and anode-proximity effects, leads to consistent results for the apex radius of curvature. In both cases, the $\text{I-V}$ data is approximately reproduced for $R_a \simeq 9$nm. Importantly, it is found that anode-proximity plays a significant role in counter-balancing electrostatic shielding and ignoring this effect results in the requirement of a much smaller value of $R_a$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.