Paper detail

A Human Computer Interaction Solution for Radiology Reporting: Evaluation of the Factors of Variation

The purpose of this research is to evaluate the human and technical factors required to create a human-computer interface (HCI) for a structured reporting solution based on eye-gaze and speech signals. Gaze and speech signals from radiologists acquired during simulated image interpretation and dictation sessions were analyzed to determine a) variation of temporal relationship between eye gaze and speech in a dictation environment, and b) variation in eye movements for a particular image interpretation task among radiologists. Knowledge of these factors provides information regarding the complexity of the image interpretation or dictation task, and provides information that can be used to design a HCI for use in diagnostic radiology. Our ultimate goal is to use these data to create an HCI to automate the generation of a particular type of structured radiology report. Our data indicate that the a) temporal relationships between eye gaze and speech and b) scan paths substantially vary among radiologists, thus implying that an HCI system based on eye gaze and speech for automating the capture of data for structured reporting processes should be customized for each user. The image resolution and layout, image content, and order of targets during an image interpretation session are not relevant factors to consider when designing an HCI. Our findings can be applied to the design of other HCI solutions for radiological applications that involve visual inspection and verbal descriptions of image findings.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.