Paper detail

A Highly Complete Spectroscopic Survey of the GOODS-N Field

We present a table of redshifts for 2907 galaxies and stars in the 145 square arcmin HST ACS GOODS-North, making this the most spectroscopically complete redshift sample obtained to date in a field of this size. We also include the redshifts, where available, in a table containing just under 7000 galaxies from the ACS area with K_s(AB)<24.5 measured from a deep K_s image obtained with WIRCam on the CFHT, as well as in a table containing 1016 sources with NUV(AB)<25 and 478 sources with FUV(AB)<25.5 (there is considerable overlap) measured from the deep GALEX images in the ACS area. Finally, we include the redshifts, where available, in a table containing the 1199 24 micron sources to 80 uJy measured from the wider-area Spitzer GOODS-North. The redshift identifications are greater than 90% complete to magnitudes of F435W(AB)=24.5, F850LP(AB)=23.3, and K_s(AB)=21.5 and to 24 micron fluxes of 250 uJy. An extensive analysis of these data will appear in a parallel paper, but here we determine how efficient color-selection techniques are at identifying high-redshift galaxies and Active Galactic Nuclei. We also examine the feasibility of doing tomography of the intergalactic medium with a 30 m telescope.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.