Paper detail

A Higher-Order Cheeger's Inequality

A basic fact in algebraic graph theory is that the number of connected components in an undirected graph is equal to the multiplicity of the eigenvalue 1 in the normalized adjacency matrix of the graph. In particular, the graph is disconnected if and only if there are at least two eigenvalues equal to 1. Cheeger's inequality provides an "approximate" version of the latter fact, and it states that a graph has a sparse cut (it is "almost disconnected") if and only if there are at least two eigenvalues that are close to one. It has been conjectured that an analogous characterization holds for higher multiplicities, that is there are $k$ eigenvalues close to 1 if and only if the vertex set can be partitioned into $k$ subsets, each defining a sparse cut. In this paper we resolve this conjecture. Our result provides a theoretical justification for clustering algorithms that use the top $k$ eigenvector to embed the vertices into $\R^k$, and then apply geometric considerations to the embedding.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.