Paper detail

A high resolution study of intergalactic O VI absorbers at z~2.3

[Abridged] We present a detailed study of the largest sample of intervening O VI systems in the redshift range 1.9 < z < 3.1 detected in high resolution (R ~ 45,000) spectra of 18 bright QSOs observed with VLT/UVES. Based on Voigt profile and apparent optical depth analysis we find that (i) the Doppler parameters of the O VI absorption are usually broader than those of C IV (ii) the column density distribution of O VI is steeper than that of C IV (iii) line spread (δv) of the O VI and C IV are strongly correlated (at 5.3σlevel) with δv(O VI) being systematically larger than δv(C IV) and (iv) δv(O VI) and δv(C IV) are also correlated (at > 5σlevel) with their respective column densities and with N(H I) (3 and 4.5 σrespectively). These findings favor the idea that C IV and O VI absorption originate from different phases of a correlated structure and systems with large velocity spread are probably associated with overdense regions. The velocity offset between optical depth weighted redshifts of C IV and O VI absorption is found to be in the range 0 < |Δv (O VI - CIV)| < 48 km/s with a median value of 8 km/s. We compare the properties of O VI systems in our sample with that of low redshift (z < 0.5) samples from the literature and find that (i) the O VI components at low-z are systematically wider than at high-z with an enhanced non-thermal contribution to their b-parameter, (ii) the slope of the column density distribution functions for high and low-z are consistent, (iii) range in gas temperature estimated from a subsample of well aligned absorbers are similar at both high and low-z, and (iv) Ω_{O VI} = (1.0 \pm 0.2) \times10^{-7} for N(O VI) > 10^{13.7} cm^{-2}, estimated in our high-z sample, is very similar to low-z estimations.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.